Show me the money

Greetings,

No, I'm not asking for donations.  The money that big pharma is using to push their vaccine agenda is becoming very apparent & a few articles came to light this week that shows this.

So, lets take a look at Dr. Paul Offit to start.  Whenever you see a story on vaccines on TV, this is the first person that you see.  Rarely do you get the other side of the argument but if you do hear the other side, if you do they don't get nearly the same amount of air time as Dr. Offit does. 

So, how much money does Dr. Offit get paid to promote vaccines?  2 words - too much.  He holds a $1.5 million dollar research chair at Children's Hospital in Philly which is funded by Merck.  He holds a patent on an anti-diarrhea vaccine, developed by Merck for which the future royalties were sold for over $180 million.  Dr. Offit's share - unknown.  Dr. Offit is also a consultant for Merck.

Merck pays webmd.com $3.5 million per year to have a Lifetime of Vaccines web page on their website.   

Merck also used their influence to make sure a bill was passed in the State of California that a child could get vaccines without the consent of their parents.  A student could even get the Gardisil shot.  Merck paid 25 different lawmakers varying amounts of money.  (again, Merck comes into play)

Just this week, the Institute of Medicine came out & said that the current vaccination schedule is safe for our children that are receiving them.  Most would read thru this article & not give it a second thought.  But a more careful read will show "the bottom line."

"In this most comprehensive examination of the immunization schedule to date, the IOM committee uncovered no evidence of major safety concerns associated with adherence to the childhood immunization schedule, which should help to reassure a diverse group of stakeholders," according to the report.

Let take a look at how the immunization schedule is set up.  There is an advisory committee to the CDC that sets up the schedule, as to how many vaccines & when.  Most of the people on this advisory committee are shareholders in pharmaceutical companies.  So the more money that the pharmaceuticals companies make, the more money they make.  The members of this committee are supposed to fill out forms that shows their vested interests but most of the time this section isn't filled out & no questions are asked.

So, big pharma wants to start "vaccinations" on infants as soon as they are born & have us continue throughout our lifetime.  Lifelong customers is what you'll hear from a lot of retail stores, I don't think big pharma is any different.

Like I've said before, there is time & place for doctors & medicine.  How many of you growing up were taken to the clinic every 2 months?  Ask your parents, I'm going to guess you weren't.  I remember going every year thru age 10 & then I only went as needed.  I mainly visited specialists for a few years because of severe allergies & migraines.  A chiropracter that I talked to once said that the stress of losing my dad when I was 7 made my immune system go "tilt" & go bonkers for awhile which may have caused a lot of my health issues when I was younger.  I still have some issues but have managed to overcome a great deal of them thru natural healing.

You have the power to heal yourself, don't ask permission when none is required. 

Until next time,

Lori

Reference pages -

http://www.medpagetoday.com/Pediatrics/Vaccines/36866

http://vactruth.com/2013/01/04/merck-paid-webmd-millions/?utm_source=The+Vaccine+Truth+Newsletter&utm_campaign=081d7be8e1-01_03_2013_webmd&utm_medium=email

http://www.drpauloffit.org/

http://www.phillymag.com/articles/will-this-doctor-hurt-your-baby/2/

http://www.whale.to/v/offit1.html

http://www.whale.to/vaccine/september_15.html

http://www.webmd.com/lifetime-of-vaccines/history

http://www.calwatchdog.com/2011/09/06/merck-funded-anti-parent-bill/

A Super Close Look at the Flu Shot

Greetings,

As I was researching for the last article, I came across this info.  It's very damming & very informational.

The informational material I found was the MSDS sheets on vaccines, Thimerosal & Mercury.  I hope you are sitting down when you read this & please pass it on to every parent, pregnant mom & anybody else that might be interested in this. 

First, lets take a look at the MSDS sheet for mercury.  Remember, there is 25 mcg of mercury in this years flu shot. 

Section 3 - Hazards Identification -

The substance may be toxic to blood, kidneys, liver, brain, peripheral nervous system, central nervous system (CNS). Repeated or prolonged exposure to the substance can produce target organs damage.  Repeated exposure to a highly toxic material may produce general deterioration of health by an accumulation in one or many human organs.  (think about annual flu shots here)

 

Section 7 -  Handling & Storage -

 

Do not ingest.  (but its ok to inject?)

 

Section 11 - Toxicological Information

 

May affect genetic material. May cause cancer based on animal data. Passes through the placental barrier in animal. May cause adverse reproductive effects(paternal effects- spermatogenesis; effects on fertility - fetotoxicity, post-implantation mortality), and birth defects.  (remember, they suggest pregnant moms get the flu shot)

 

Section 13 - Disposal Info -

 

Waste must be disposed of in accordance with federal, state and local environmental control regulations.

Section 15 - Regulatory Information -

California prop. 65: This product contains the following ingredients for which the State of California has found to cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm, which would require a warning under the statute: Mercury California prop. 65: This product contains the following ingredients for which the State of California has found to cause birth defects which would require a warning under the statute:

 

DSCL (EEC):
R33- Danger of cumulative effects.  S2- Keep out of the reach of children. 

Now looking back over this info that I pulled from the MSDS sheet & thinking about the Flu shot that has 25 mcg of mercury in it.  Do you REALLY want that stuff in injected into you?

Now, lets take a look at Thimerosal.  This is still in some vaccines, mostly in trace amounts BUT its still there.

Section 3 - Hazards Identification

The substance may be toxic to kidneys, liver, spleen, bone marrow, central nervous system (CNS). Repeated or prolonged exposure to the substance can produce target organs damage. Repeated exposure to a highly toxic material may produce general deterioration of health by an accumulation in one or many human organs.

 

Section 11 - Toxological Information

May cause cancer based on animal data. No human data found. May cause adverse reproductive effects(female fertility - post implanation mortality, fetotoxicity)and birth defects. May affect genetic material

Special Remarks on other Toxic Effects on Humans:

Acute exposure to high concentrations of mercury vapors may also cause kidney damage and affect behavior/central nervous system, peripheral nervous system and autonomic nervous system

Chronic exposure to mercury vapors behavior/central nervous system and peripheral nervous system (depression, irritability, nervousness, weakness, ataxia, fatigue, tremor, jerky gait, limb spasms, personality changes)

Section 13 - Disposal Considerations

Waste must be disposed of in accordance with federal, state and local environmental control regulations.
Section 15 - Other Regulatory Information

California prop. 65: This product contains the following ingredients for which the State of California has found to cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm, which would require a warning under the statute: Thimerosal California prop. 65: This product contains the following ingredients for which the State of California has found to cause birth defects which would require a warning under the statute:

Now, lets take a look at the Novartis FluVirin MSDS sheet.  This is shocking if I haven't shocked you enough as it is.

Section 3 - Hazard Information

3.3. Avoid contact with the material if you are pregnant or breast-feeding.

(Read that again, they are telling pregnant women to get this shot)

Section 4 - First Aid Info

Seek medical attention if unusual symptoms occur e.g. high temperature, shivering, tiredness, headache, sweating, muscle pain, joint pain and generally feeling unwell. Following vaccination (i.e. deliberate subcutaneous inoculation), fever, malaise, myalgia, headache and other systemic symptoms can occur, especially in young children who have had no previous exposure to influenza antigens. These reactions begin 6-12 hours after vaccination and persist for 1 to 2 days. In older persons, vaccination is not associated with higher rates of systemic symptoms.

Section 11 - Toxological Information

The vaccine contains mercury at approximately 2.48μg per 0.5 mL dose (pre-filled syringe) and 24.8μg of mercury per 0.5 mL dose (multi dose vials).

Section 12 - Ecological Information

The vaccine contains mercury and therefore should be prevented from entering watercourses or the atmosphere (by aerosol).
Section 13 - Disposal Considerations

Residues of mercury containing compounds are generally classified as special waste. Contact your local waste disposal authority for advice, or pass to a chemical disposal company.

Mercury has been classified for special waste BUT yet its ok to inject into people.  What is wrong with this picture??!!??

There are many more MSDS sheets listed for vaccines at this website -

http://www.bdipharma.com/clinical-pi-msds-vaccines.aspx

Are you disgusted as I am after reading this info & thinking about all the lies we are told via the TV news, news papers, our local officials & our doctors who are supposed to have our health in our best interest?  Remember part of the oath that doctors take - Do no harm. 

If you local TV stations talk about how "There is still time to get your flu shot," please pass on this info.  I'm doing my best to get the info out there but I can only cover so much. 

Thank you for your ongoing support.  You don't know how your readership has helped me the last 18 months when I was so low & feeling defeated.

Until next time,

Lori

Works cited -


http://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9927224

http://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9925236

http://www.bdipharma.com/MSDS/Novartis/Fluvirin%203-09.pdf

Another Look at the Flu Shot

Greetings,

As I look at articles posted on the net, I see more & more nurses are being fired for not getting the flu shot as mandated by their employer.  The employers are saying that getting the flu shot will reduce the risk of transmission to their patients.  Is this really the fact?  What does research actually say?

The Cochrane Institute did 25 studies that involved over 59,000 participants & found that

“There is no reliable evidence that inactivated influenza vaccines [the standard types of vaccines of today] affect either person-to-person spread of influenza or complications such as death or pneumonia…and [this] relates both to healthcare workers, community-dwellers and people in institutions.”

Another interesting point of this study was -

Vaccine use did not affect the number of people hospitalised or working days lost.

Another interesting point of these studies is -

The review showed that reliable evidence on the flu vaccine is thin but there is wide spread evidence of wide spread manipulation of concluions and spurious notoriety of the studies.

Widespread manipulation?  Considering that the vaccine industry helped fund 15 of the studies, this is no surprise to me.

So, why is there the push to vaccinate health care workers?  Why are employers telling their nurses, even ones that have been there for over 20 years, get your flu shot or else.  The Department of Health & Human Services want employers to have a 90% flu shot rate.  Starting this year, health care providers could see a cut in their Medicare funding if they don't report vaccination rates.  Once again it all boils down to  one word - money.  Money for health care providers & money for big pharma.

Does OSHA support the mandation of the flu shot?  Here is what OSHA says about the flu shot.

"Although OSHA does not specifically require employees to take the vaccines, an employer may do so. In that case, an employee who refuses vaccination because of a reasonable belief that he or she has a medical condition that creates a real danger of serious illness or death (such as serious reaction to the vaccine) may be protected under Section 11(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 pertaining to whistle blower rights. "

This section basically states that an employee can't be discriminated against as filed a complaint under this act. 

So why do hospitals continue to mandate the flu shot for their employees & threaten termination if they don't get it or at least mandate them to wear a mask if they don't?  This is a good question.  The requirement of an employee having to wear a mask is identifying them as a person that refuses to comply with the flu shot mandation. 

This is a topic that needs to be addressed by nurses, CNAs & other health care providers.

Until next time,
Lori


Works Cited -

http://gaia-health.com/gaia-blog/2012-10-05/no-value-in-any-influenza-vaccine-cochrane-collaboration-study/

http://focusonline.ca/?q=node/447

http://www.truthistreason.net/%E2%80%98influenza-vaccine-has-no-effect%E2%80%99-cochrane-collaboration-study-says

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD001269.pub4/pdf/abstract

http://vactruth.com/2012/09/22/no-flu-shot-no-job/

http://www.usnews.com/science/articles/2010/10/26/should-health-care-workers-be-required-to-get-flu-vaccinations

http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2012/02/13/prsc0214.htm

http://www.naturalnews.com/037620_flu_vaccines_effectiveness_exaggerations.html

More News on Fukushima

Greetings,

As the fiscal cliff looms, I wonder what kind of world we'll wake up to on January 1st.  We know that food prices are going to go up, so called "experts" are saying they will only go up 2-3% but I think in reality it will be closer to 10-15%.  Gas prices will probably go up along with other necessities.  January 1st of 2014, health insurance premiums will definitely go up.  So if you are paying a high premium amount now, just think of what you'll be paying in about a year. 

But what about what is going on in the world, specifically Fukushima?  This problem isn't going to be going away any time soon. 

The radiation cloud isn't going away, the University of Maryland is still tracking it.

http://www.woweather.com/weather/news/fukushima?LANG=us&VAR=niluhemis131&HH=0&LOOP=1

Navy workers are suing because of irreparable harm that was done to their health because of radiation levels that exceeded safety standards.


http://enenews.com/navy-rescue-workers-sue-japan-over-fukushima-cover-up-irreparable-harm-to-their-life-expectancy-govt-and-tepco-conspired


"According to then-existing data uniquely known to the defendant at the time, the plaintiffs' consequent exposure to radiation within their zone of operation, then indicated that radiation levels had already reached levels exceeding the levels of exposure to which those living the same distance from Chernobyl experienced who subsequently developed cancer," the complaint states.

 http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/12/26/53414.htm
 
 So if the levels exceeded those of Chernobyl, some distance away imagine what has reached us?  The coverup on this has disgusted me to no end.  It makes me wonder what kind of world that my grand children & great grandchildren are going to grow up in.

Until next time, have a safe week.

Lori

A word about SSRI's

Greetings,

As our country is still reeling from the shootings in Sandy Hook, the biggest question is "Why did this happen?"  Just yesterday I read in the news reports that they want to put an armed office in every school to prevent this from happening again.  Is more gun control the answer?  In a forum that I hang out, one person said that guns are not needed in the school system or in the home.  Is that really the answer?

Lets take a look at the history of school violence.  The worst school attack hasn't been in the 20 years.  It actually occurred in the late 20's in Bath, MI.  38 kids & 7 adults were killed.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=103186662

A single bullet wasn't fired, a knife wasn't drawn, just a upset tax payer that his tax dollars was going to the school system.  You didn't know about that attack?  Not many people do, its a dirty little secret that has been buried in the history books.

School attacks started within 1 year of SSRI medication being administered to people. 

http://ssristories.com/index.php

What are SSRI's?  They are Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors.  They are commonly prescribed for depression.   Lets take a look a closer look at what these letters mean.

Selective - highly specific in activity or effect

Serotonin -  Serotonin or 5-hydroxytryptamine is a monoamine neurotransmitter. Biochemically derived from tryptophan, serotonin is primarily found in the gastrointestinal tract, platelets, and in the central nervous system of animals including humans.

reuptake - the reabsorption by a neuron of a neurotransmitter following the transmission of a nerve impulse across a synapse

inhibitor - an agent that slows or interferes with a chemical action

One of the side affects of SSRI's is worsening depression.  They also make it so some may lack any sort of empathy towards others.  Most of the people who have done these attacks on schools were on some sort mind altering drug.  Big pharma & FDA are wroking together to try to get every single American on some sort of psychiatric drug.  I've even read some articles where they want to put Lithium in our water supply.  Fluoride is already being put into our water supply under the guise its for our teeth.  It was given to prisoners in concentration camps to lessen their tendency to want to escape. 

There is a time & place for doctors & medicine.  But the practice of haphazardly prescribing medicines without proper follow up needs to end.  I wonder how many doctors have actually read the inser that comes with drugs they are prescribing?  When I read a vaccine insert, it takes me almost 2 hours to read it from start to finish.  Then I cover it again, high lighting the important stuff.

As I was doing some research for this article, I came across this web page on how Psychiatric Drugs are making America mad.  A very long but good read -
 
http://www.alternet.org/story/155001/how_psychiatric_drugs_made_america_mad?page=0%2C0

This article is in NO WAY trying to downplay the Sandy Hook shooting.  I cried when I read the news online & as I watched the news on TV.  I hugged my daughter tighter & longer that day & in the days to come. 

Have a great holiday & a great week.  It will be a very busy week around our home.

Until next time,
Lori

An Analysis of Proposition 37

Greetings readers,

 

As the semester winds down, we had to choose a final project for my composition class.  I chose a more formal paper to take a look at Proposition 37 that was voted on in the State of California.  Its unfortunate that this was voted down.  We can thank the unscrupulous companies who use GMO products for lobbying against it. 

 

Enjoy!

 

Lori

In the November 2012 elections, the State of California voted on a proposition that would require food manufacturers to label the food if it had GMO grains in it. Many people in our nation feel we have the right to know what is in our food. Others really feel that it doesn't matter and that food is food. Does it matter? Many companies have done research asserting that eating GMO grains are detrimental to our health. I feel that as a nation have a right to know what is in our food because food manufacturers were required to put the ingredients on the label, if the food is made with GMO grain, we should know about it.

Proposition 37 would require food manufactures to label food going into the State of California to have a label if it has GMO product in it. Currently 20 states have bills in committee that would require the labeling of GMO products coming into the state but out of all these states, California is the only one that made it to a vote. Since the vote failed in California, the movement that brought it to a vote is now looking to Oregon and Washington to bring it to a vote again.

Proposition 37 would require raw and some processed foods to be labeled as having GMO product in them. It would prohibit food from being labeled “natural.” It would exempt foods that are certified organic, foods that unintentionally used GMO ingredients, meat that was unintentionally fed GMO grains or processed with only a small amount of GMO ingredients. It would also require the labeling of dog food with meat in it that used GMO fed animals but meat for human consumption would be exempt.

Soy products are required to have labeling but not milk and cheese products. Food coming in from other countries are not required to be labeled if they say the food doesn't have GMO product in it thereby creating a loophole for foreign countries to import their food into our country that may or may not have GMO food product in it.

So what are the positive points of GMO labeling? First off, we would know what we are eating and would have a choice as whether or not to eat a GMO food or go for the more natural unmodified food. Independent doctors and researchers have tried to warn us of the health dangers of GMO foods but the FDA has let the nation down as far as requiring the labeling of GMO products. The European union and Japan have required any food coming into the countries to be labeled, why them and not us?

A study done in Canada on 30 pregnant women found that the chemical Cry1Ab, the Bt toxin was found in pregnant women. A study done by Monsanto showed that this chemical caused kidney and liver damage in rats. A 2009 report showed that this chemical use was up by 200% and the companies that are producing it are saying that its not getting into the bodies of the people who eat the food.  Some complications of this toxin in pregnant women are; prenatal complications like abortion, prematurity, fetal growth restriction, and pre-eclampsia or reproductive disorders. C-sections and infertility cases are climbing higher and higher every year.

More than 40% of the population in 50 countries around the world have said they want GMO labeling so they can make a choice. If GMO grains are such a good deal, why not be proud of it and have the label on the food? No long term safety studies have been done on GMO food, independent scientists have said that we won't see the long term affects of ingesting GMO foods for a long time.

What is the downside to the labeling of GMO? According to opponents of Proposition 37, it would require food manufacturers to either relabel all food going into states that require labeling or make their food out of more expensive food ingredients therefore increasing the cost of food for the consumer. They are also saying that it would require new packaging with the GMO label therefore increasing the cost of the food.

According to the sponsors of opposition of Proposition 37 it was written by a lawyer that has so many laws written into that it would open up lawsuits to any grower without any evidence of harm. t hereby passing on the cost of the food to the consumer because the grower would need to recoup their losses that are lost thru lawsuits. This is one of the reasons why opponents of Proposition 37 are saying that average consumers grocery bill will go up $400 per year.

According to opponents this would be a hidden tax that would hit the people that could least afford it - the elderly and the poor. They are already on a fixed, tight income and this hidden tax would add to their burden of being able to make ends meet.

During the 2007 election, presidential candidate Barack Obama said that Americans have the right to know what they are eating. Obama said “Here’s what I’ll do as president. I’ll immediately implement country-of-origin labeling, because Americans should know where their food comes from.

We’ll let folks know whether their food has been genetically modified, because Americans should know what they’re buying.” This was said during his 2007 election campaign. The big question now is that since he has been re-elected will he keep his promise during his second term?

According to Michael Pollan in an interview that he did with Amy Goodman, he said that in a way "Obama endorsed Proposition 37.” He promised this Iowa farmers before the Iowa caucuses which led to a round of applause from the audience.

According to Pollan, “this is not a California issue, this is a national issue.” What happens in California usually spreads across the country. Gay marriage is a good example of this. First legalized

in California, it is now legal in many other states despite how many voters feel about it.

For the past 20 years Americans have tricked into eating food that is believed to be equivalent to food thanks to a Bush loophole and with the help of former Monsanto attorney Michael Taylor who was installed as the Deputy Commissioner for Policy at the FDA that drafted a policy in 1992. The FDA also approves all drugs that have been recalled over the years including almost 1,800 in 2009.   Can we really trust them to make sure we are eating safe food ?

As someone who knows how the farming community works. As someone who has seen Monsanto in action, closely watching the farmers who won't comply with their rules, watching the drivers who leave their driveways and watching them until they head to the grain dumps, I have to wonder why are they so insistent on everyone complying with their rules?

An Iowa farmer fed his pigs GMO grain only. All of his pigs became sterile. They would be impregnated, go thru the pregnancy process but when it came time for them to give birth, nothing would happen. It was like they were going thru a pseudo pregnancy. Another Iowa farmer from Milton who plants both GMO and non-GMO grain. He says that the non-GMO outproduces the GMO grain.

Do I believe that food needs to labeled if it has GMO in it? Absolutely, without a doubt. I have the right to know if I'm eating food that is going to change how my body works. I have the right to know that if I eat that food, it may cause infertility, it may change my DNA or it may cause other problems. The U.S. Is the sickest nation on earth right now. We spend more on healthcare than any other nation in the world. There are so many factors that factor into this statistic. But the one main factor that is associated with this topic is that we allow GMO product into our food and we're not even allowed to know about it.

It puts a whole new meaning to the dumbing down of America.

Works Cited

"California Proposition 37, Mandatory Labeling of Genetically Engineered Food (2012)." - Ballotpedia. Ballotpedia, n.d. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.

Dave. "A Movement Grows Around GMO Labeling From Iowa to California: Will Obama Keep His Promise in a Second Term?" Food Democracy Now RSS. Food Democracy, 2 Nov. 2012. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.

Fendley, Tom. "Yes on 37 Blog." Yes on Prop 37. Right to Know, 5 Nov. 2012. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.

"Food Democracy Now." Food Democracy Now RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.

Green, Michael. "GMOs and Prop 37: Protecting Your Right to Know, Protecting Your Health." The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 02 Nov. 2012. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.

Guillet, Ananda. "Iowa Farmers Pigs Sterile From GM Corn." Son of A Farmer RSS. N.p., 23 Jan. 2012. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.

"Label Genetically Engineered Food." Label Genetically Engineered Food. N.p., n.d. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.

"Label GMOs, Genetically Modified Foods - California Committee For The Right to Know - A 2012 Ballot Initiative Campaign." LabelGMOs. Label GMOs, n.d. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.

Main, Emily. "Genes from GMO Food Do Wind Up in People, Study Shows." Genes from GMO Food Do Wind Up in People, Study Shows. Rodal, n.d. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.

Main, Emily. "The Next Election Could Save Our Food Supply | Rodale News." The Next Election Could Save Our Food Supply | Rodale News. N.p., n.d. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.

"A Movement Grows Around GMO Labeling From Iowa to California: Will Obama Keep His Promise in a Second Term?" A Movement Grows Around GMO Labeling From Iowa to California: Will Obama Keep His Promise in a Second Term? N.p., 2 Nov. 2012. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.

"A Movement Grows Around GMO Labeling From Iowa to California: Will Obama Keep His Promise in a Second Term?" Street Insider. N.p., 2 Nov. 2012. Web. 1 Dec. 2012.

"No on Prop. 37 Get the Facts." No on Prop 37 Get the Facts Comments. N.p., n.d. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.

"Proposition 37 at Yes on Prop 37." Yes on Prop 37. N.p., n.d. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.

Roseboro, Ken. "Information to Ensure a Safe, Healthy, Sustainable Food Supply." Iowa Organic Farmer Says Non-GMO Corn Outperforms GMO. The Organic and Non-GMO Report, 1 Apr.

2011. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.

Ruskin, Gary. "California General Election." Proposition 37. State of California, n.d. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.

Westervelt, Amy. "Monsanto, DuPont Spending Millions to Oppose California's GMO Labeling Law." Forbes. Forbes Magazine, 22 Aug. 2012. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.

It is sad.........& a word about exemptions

Greetings readers,

I'm going to rant a bit here before I get into the main part of my entry. 

It is really sad when you are criticized for making an informed decision not to vaccinate your child after you have spent decades researching vaccines, their ingredients & their dangers.  It's really sad when you are told that God won't be watching over your child when he or she gets sick because of your decision NOT to vaccinate. 

If parents would keep their kids that are sick at home like they should instead of sending them to school or letting them go out in public, then most sickness wouldn't be so widespread.  It would be nice if people who promote vaccines would do their homework on how vaccines are failing left & right & are actually causing the viruses to mutate & become more deadly than they would be if they had just let nature take its course.  Whooping cough & even polio have become more deadly all thanks to vaccines.  (an entry on this will be forthcoming)  Yes, Polio is still around its just renamed to aseptic meningitis if you don't have some type of paralysis for more than 36 days.

Sorry to sound so harsh or mean.  But I saw the wording about God not looking after my daughter since I made the conscious decision not to vaccinate, it just made my blood boil.

I've checked on my past post about exemptions & most of those links are now down or out of date.  So here are new ones.

Here is a link of doctors nationwide that are friendly towards families that have made the choice to not vaccinate their children.

http://vaclib.org/basic/health/novaxdoctors.htm

Here is the link to the paperwork for states nationwide & some countries to opt out of the vaccine program.

http://vaclib.org/exemption.htm

And if your doctor does press the issue, hand him this form.  He gives you a form that tells you that you understand that you are putting your child at risk by not vaccinating.  He/she is putting themselves at risk for telling you that vaccines are safe & nothing is going to happen to your child if they inject those toxins into your child.

http://www.naturalnews.com/036006_vaccination_doctor_form.html

Remember, vaccine manufacturers are zero liability when it comes to vaccines.  If your child is injured or dies after getting a vaccine, you have to go to court & prove it was the vaccine that did it & not something else.  Billions has been paid out to parents.  If vaccines are so safe, why is there a hazard tax attached to each vaccine?  If vaccines are safe, then why are vaccine manufacturers immune from direct lawsuits from parents of vaccine injured children? 

I guarantee that 99.9% of doctors will NOT sign the form.  They will leave the room & tell you to have a nice day.

As the semester winds down (only 5 days left), I'm getting more ideas for future blog articles.  One is about Polio being renamed.  Another one is about the flu shot with info from high ranking institutions. Another one is about whooping cough mutating all because of the vaccine.

Have a great week,

Lori