Greetings readers,
As the semester winds down, we had to choose a final project for my composition class. I chose a more formal paper to take a look at Proposition 37 that was voted on in the State of California. Its unfortunate that this was voted down. We can thank the unscrupulous companies who use GMO products for lobbying against it.
Enjoy!
Lori
In the November 2012 elections, the
State of California voted on a proposition that would require food manufacturers to label the
food if it had GMO grains in it. Many people in our nation feel we have the right to know what is in
our food. Others really feel that it doesn't matter and that food is
food. Does it matter? Many companies
have done research asserting that eating GMO grains are detrimental to our health. I feel that
as a nation have a right to know what is in our food because food manufacturers were required to put the
ingredients on the label, if the food is made with GMO grain,
we should know about it.
Proposition 37 would require food
manufactures to label food going into the State of California to have a label if it has GMO product
in it. Currently 20 states have bills in committee that would require the labeling of GMO products
coming into the state but out of all these states, California is the only one that made it to a vote. Since
the vote failed in California, the movement that brought it to a
vote is now looking to Oregon and
Washington to bring it to a vote again.
Proposition 37 would require raw and
some processed foods to be labeled as having GMO product in them. It would prohibit
food from being labeled “natural.” It would exempt foods that
are
certified organic, foods that
unintentionally used GMO ingredients, meat that was unintentionally
fed GMO grains or processed with only a
small amount of GMO ingredients. It would also require the
labeling of dog food with meat in it
that used GMO fed animals but meat for human consumption
would be exempt.
Soy products are required to have
labeling but not milk and cheese products. Food coming in from other countries are not required
to be labeled if they say the food doesn't have GMO product in it thereby creating a loophole for foreign
countries to import their food into our country that may or may not have GMO food product in it.
So what are the positive points of GMO
labeling? First off, we would know what we are eating and would have a choice as whether or
not to eat a GMO food or go for the more natural unmodified food. Independent doctors and
researchers have tried to warn us of the health dangers of GMO foods but the FDA has let the nation down as
far as requiring the labeling of GMO products. The European union and Japan have required any food
coming into the countries to be labeled, why them and not us?
A study done in Canada on 30 pregnant women found that the chemical Cry1Ab, the Bt toxin was found in pregnant women. A study done by Monsanto showed that this chemical caused kidney and liver damage in rats. A 2009 report showed that this chemical use was up by 200% and the companies that are producing it are saying that its not getting into the bodies of the people who eat the food. Some complications of this toxin in pregnant women are; prenatal complications like abortion, prematurity, fetal growth restriction, and pre-eclampsia or reproductive disorders. C-sections and infertility cases are climbing higher and higher every year.
More than 40% of the population in 50
countries around the world have said they want GMO labeling so they can make a choice. If
GMO grains are such a good deal, why not be proud of it and
have the label on the food? No long
term safety studies have been done on GMO food, independent
scientists have said that we won't see
the long term affects of ingesting GMO foods for a long time.
What is the downside to the labeling of GMO? According to opponents of Proposition 37, it would require food manufacturers to either relabel all food going into states that require labeling or make their food out of more expensive food ingredients therefore increasing the cost of food for the consumer. They are also saying that it would require new packaging with the GMO label therefore increasing the cost of the food.
According to the sponsors of
opposition of Proposition 37 it was written by a lawyer that has so many laws written into that it would
open up lawsuits to any grower without any evidence of harm. t
hereby passing on the cost of the food
to the consumer because the grower would need to recoup their losses that are lost thru lawsuits.
This is one of the reasons why opponents of Proposition 37 are saying
that average consumers grocery bill
will go up $400 per year.
According to opponents this would be a
hidden tax that would hit the people that could least afford it - the elderly and the poor.
They are already on a fixed, tight income and this hidden tax would add to their burden of being able to
make ends meet.
During the 2007 election, presidential
candidate Barack Obama said that Americans have the right to know what they are eating.
Obama said “Here’s what I’ll do as president. I’ll
immediately
implement country-of-origin labeling,
because Americans should know where their food comes from.
We’ll let folks know whether their food has been genetically modified, because Americans should know what they’re buying.” This was said during his 2007 election campaign. The big question now is that since he has been re-elected will he keep his promise during his second term?
According to Michael Pollan in an
interview that he did with Amy Goodman, he said that in a way "Obama endorsed Proposition 37.”
He promised this Iowa farmers before the Iowa caucuses
which led to a round of applause from
the audience.
According to Pollan, “this is not a
California issue, this is a national issue.” What happens in California usually spreads across the
country. Gay marriage is a good example of this. First legalized
in California, it is now legal in many
other states despite how many voters feel about it.
For the past 20 years Americans have
tricked into eating food that is believed to be equivalent to food thanks to a Bush loophole and with
the help of former Monsanto attorney Michael Taylor who
was installed as the Deputy
Commissioner for Policy at the FDA that drafted a policy in 1992.
The
FDA also approves all drugs that have
been recalled over the years including almost 1,800 in 2009.
Can we really trust them to make sure
we are eating safe food ?
As someone who knows how the farming
community works. As someone who has seen Monsanto in action, closely watching
the farmers who won't comply with their rules, watching the
drivers who leave their driveways and
watching them until they head to the grain dumps, I have to wonder why are they so insistent on
everyone complying with their rules?
An Iowa farmer fed his pigs GMO grain
only. All of his pigs became sterile. They would be impregnated, go thru the pregnancy
process but when it came time for them to give birth, nothing would happen. It was like they were
going thru a pseudo pregnancy. Another Iowa farmer from Milton
who plants both GMO and non-GMO grain.
He says that the non-GMO outproduces the GMO grain.
Do I believe that food needs to
labeled if it has GMO in it? Absolutely, without a doubt. I have the right to know if I'm eating food
that is going to change how my body works. I have the right to
know that if I eat that food, it may
cause infertility, it may change my DNA or it may cause other
problems. The U.S. Is the sickest
nation on earth right now. We spend more on healthcare than any
other nation in the world. There are
so many factors that factor into this statistic. But the one main
factor that is associated with this
topic is that we allow GMO product into our food and we're not even allowed to know about it.
It puts a whole new meaning to the
dumbing down of America.
Works Cited
"California Proposition 37,
Mandatory Labeling of Genetically Engineered Food (2012)." -
Ballotpedia. Ballotpedia, n.d. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.
Dave. "A Movement Grows Around GMO
Labeling From Iowa to California: Will Obama Keep His Promise in a
Second Term?" Food Democracy Now RSS. Food Democracy, 2
Nov. 2012. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.
Fendley, Tom. "Yes on 37 Blog."
Yes on Prop 37. Right to Know, 5 Nov. 2012. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.
"Food Democracy Now." Food
Democracy Now RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.
Green, Michael. "GMOs and Prop 37:
Protecting Your Right to Know, Protecting Your Health." The
Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 02 Nov. 2012. Web. 01
Dec. 2012.
Guillet, Ananda. "Iowa Farmers
Pigs Sterile From GM Corn." Son of A Farmer RSS. N.p., 23
Jan. 2012. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.
"Label Genetically Engineered
Food." Label Genetically Engineered Food. N.p., n.d. Web.
01 Dec. 2012.
"Label GMOs, Genetically Modified
Foods - California Committee For The Right to Know - A 2012 Ballot
Initiative Campaign." LabelGMOs. Label GMOs, n.d. Web. 01
Dec. 2012.
Main, Emily. "Genes from GMO Food
Do Wind Up in People, Study Shows." Genes from GMO Food Do
Wind Up in People, Study Shows. Rodal, n.d. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.
Main, Emily. "The Next Election
Could Save Our Food Supply | Rodale News." The Next Election
Could Save Our Food Supply | Rodale News. N.p., n.d. Web. 01
Dec. 2012.
"A Movement Grows Around GMO
Labeling From Iowa to California: Will Obama Keep His Promise in a
Second Term?" A Movement Grows Around GMO Labeling From Iowa
to California: Will Obama Keep His Promise in a Second Term?
N.p., 2 Nov. 2012. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.
"A Movement Grows Around GMO
Labeling From Iowa to California: Will Obama Keep His Promise in a
Second Term?" Street Insider. N.p., 2 Nov. 2012. Web. 1
Dec. 2012.
"No on Prop. 37 Get the Facts."
No on Prop 37 Get the Facts Comments. N.p., n.d. Web. 01 Dec.
2012.
"Proposition 37 at Yes on Prop
37." Yes on Prop 37. N.p., n.d. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.
Roseboro, Ken. "Information to
Ensure a Safe, Healthy, Sustainable Food Supply." Iowa
Organic Farmer Says Non-GMO Corn Outperforms GMO. The Organic
and Non-GMO Report, 1 Apr.
2011. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.
Ruskin, Gary. "California General
Election." Proposition 37. State of California, n.d. Web.
01 Dec. 2012.
Westervelt, Amy. "Monsanto, DuPont
Spending Millions to Oppose California's GMO Labeling Law."
Forbes. Forbes Magazine, 22 Aug. 2012. Web. 01 Dec. 2012.
No comments:
Post a Comment