Vaccinating trees?

On Oct. 9th and 10th, I attended a live stream conference from Healing for the Ages. This conference is put on by 4 doctors- Dr. Bryan Ardis, Dr. Ed Group, Dr. Henele Ealy and Dr. Jana Schmidt. I got many blog ideas as I was watching this conference but also watching the chat. One lady said the city that she lives in was offering to vaccinate trees from the Emerald Ash Borer that seems to love Ash trees for some reason. I had never heard of this so I decided to look into this further.

The Emerald Ash Borer is a small bug, smaller than a pennny that can kill a Ash tree.

The first question I have is why does the destructive bug like the Ash tree so much?

This is what google AI said-

Emerald ash borers are monophagous, meaning they are biologically specialized to feed and reproduce almost exclusively on ash trees (Fraxinus species).

Key Reasons for the Attraction

• Chemical Attractants: The beetles use specialized chemoreception to detect specific chemical volatiles and aromas emitted by ash trees that signal a suitable host for feeding and laying eggs.

• Evolutionary History: The emerald ash borer evolved in Asia alongside Asian ash species (such as the Manchurian ash), which developed natural chemical defenses and co-evolved resistance mechanisms over thousands of years.

• Lack of North American Defenses: North American ash species (like green, white, and black ash) share no common evolutionary history with the beetle. As a result, they lack the specific natural defenses needed to stop the insect.

• Nutrient-Rich Phloem Layer: Female beetles lay eggs in the bark crevices, and the hatching larvae burrow directly into the inner bark (the phloem and cambium layers). This layer is packed with the sugars and nutrients the tree transports, making it an ideal food source for the developing larvae

The second question is How did this destructive bug get here?

Again, google AI says-

The emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) arrived in North America in solid wood packing material—such as wooden crating, pallets, or dunnage—used in international cargo ships coming from its native range in eastern Asia.

Key Details of the Introduction:

• Native Origin: The beetle is native to temperate forests in northeastern Asia, including parts of China, Korea, eastern Russia, Japan, and Mongolia.

• Time of Arrival: Scientists estimate the pest arrived and went undetected in the United States during the early-to-mid 1990s.

• First Discovery: It was officially identified in North America in summer 2002, after mass tree die-offs were noticed near Detroit, Michigan, and Windsor, Ontario.

• Why It Spreads: Unlike Asian ash trees, North American ash species have no natural resistance or co-evolved defense mechanisms against the beetle. Subsequent spread across dozens of states and provinces has been driven by natural flight and the human transport of infested firewood, logs, and nursery stock.

Now, look at the last statement-Asian Ash trees have some resistance to these bugs unlike American Ash trees.

How do Asian Ash trees resist these bugs? According to the US Forestry Service the Asian Ash trees and the Emerald Ash borer evolved with each other and therefore, developed resistance to the bug. The Ash trees here in the US haven't seen these bugs so they are falling to this invasive bug. There has been some testing by doing a hybrid of differernt Ash trees to see if they can find one that is resistant to the Emerald Ash borer.

When a female is looking to lay her eggs, she avoids healthy Manchurian ash trees, much preferring a North American ash or a Manchurian ash weakened by drought. As it turns out, a healthy Manchurian ash is a hostile place for the larvae. When emerald ash borer’s eggs hatch in the trees, the larvae struggle to survive. It is easier for the larvae to survive if the tree is stressed, unhealthy or weakened by drought.

Once the larvae becomes an adult, then they are strong enought to attack and kill healthy Ash trees.

As we know, the current defense to the Emerald Ash borer is to cut down Ash trees, both the ones that have been infested and the ones that haven't in order to slow or stop the spread of the Emerald Ash borer. This done during their dormant time, which is October thru April.

The spread of the Emerald Ash borer hasn't been stopped. They continue to spread to areas that they haven't been in. A quarantine was lifted in January 2021 as restrictions and bans weren't working.

Some communities are vaccinating their trees against the Emerald Ash Borer. I had never heard of this before. Google AI said the chemcial that is used is emamectin benzoate, which provides reliable protection for 2 to 3 years. The cost is quite high, is $7 to $16 per inch of diameter at breast height (DBH) for a multi-year cycle. Now think, if a community has dozens or hundreds of Ash trees lining streets or in the yards of homes, this cost can add up quite quickly. It economically makes sense to cut the tree down than to "vaccinate" the tree.

But, our forests are thinned out when these Ash trees are cut down. That beautiful canopy of trees isn't as full, there isn't as much shade, when fall comes the leaves from the Ash trees isn't among the beauty of fall colors or on the ground that we slide our feet thru when walking.

I'm a frequent visit to the north shore of Lake Superior. I like to hike in the various forests. Not one is the same as another one. The canopy of trees, the under growth and even the sounds of the forest is different. When you are the only one in the area, it's an incredible feeling. It's hard to describe. Now imagine if a fraction of that forest has been cut down, everything changes.

I understand why the cities and forestry service are doing what they are doing. I just wonder, which has the higher cost? Vaccinating the tree or thinning out the forests?

Food for thought.

Blood transfusions, Covid 19 injections and Turbo cancer

In Feb. of 2025, I wrote an article on how my husband got tainted blood during his cancer treatments. Ever since 2022, I've seen Facebook post after post about how the blood supply is safe and that the spike protein doesn't stay in the blood supply and it doesn't cause turbo cancer. I've also seen many posts on how turbo cancer is a made up term and doesn't exist. This article will disprove those theories.

First, lets look at the safety of the blood supply. As I stated in that February article, the Red Cross didn't believe me and in fact called me a liar outright. And that I didn't see what I saw and what I was saying was impossible. The blood supply isn't safe, it has never been safe. It took the Red Cross 10 years to acknowledge there was a huge risk in the 80s from the HIV/AIDS being in the blood supply. As it was, many hemophiliac patients got HIV/AIDS tainted blood and subsequently developed HIV. I spent a year doing volunteer work in the blood center in the late 80s, so I was coming in at the tail end of their acknowledging the risk. I saw short cuts being taken because they "knew the person" and other things. I won't go into specifics but as a result of what I saw, I rejected all blood products when I lost 65% of my blood supply March 28, 1990 due to postpartum hemorrhaging. It took a year to get back on my feet, but I did it......all while nursing a newborn.

When a person received a Covid injection, they are told the spike protein stays in the arm and is gone within a day or 2. Studies are now showing this to be inocrrect. It's being found in the testes, the ovaries, the heart and so on. Dr. Peter McCullough has said that the spike protein is being seen YEARS later. The manufacturers knew in 2022, that the spike protein stays in the body for 6 months.

In 2024, Japan was calling for caution on blood products from vaccinated people. All while the the American Red Cross was stating that the blood supply was safe.

Here is a collage of 9 case studies of people who have been harmed after blood transufusions.

(Credit for the collage-blessedbyhisblood.com)

In this article, based on these circumstances and the volume of evidence that has recently come to light, we call the attention of medical professionals to the various risks associated with blood transfusions using blood products derived from people who have suffered from long COVID and from genetic vaccine recipients, including those who have received mRNA vaccines, and we make proposals regarding specific tests, testing methods, and regulations to deal with these risks.

It has been reported from various countries around the world that genetic vaccines such as mRNA vaccines encoding spike proteins have also caused a wide variety of diseases in all organs and systems, including the nervous system, in addition to thrombosis and resulting cardiovascular disorders in vaccine recipients

There are two general mechanisms by which a modified gene introduced into the body by genetic vaccination and some of the antigens produced because of the expression of that gene can be transmitted throughout the body. First, LNPs encapsulating mRNA can spread through the body via the bloodstream from the injection site. It has already been shown that LNPs have a tendency to accumulate in specific organs, such as the liver, spleen, ovaries, testes, and bone marrow. The other is the release of pseudouridinated mRNA molecules and synthesized spike proteins as extracellular vesicles, or exosomes, from cells that have incorporated LNPs.

Since the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic and genetic vaccination, there has been much debate about the safety of blood products and their use in transfusions

Contrary to initial expectations, it was found that genes and proteins from genetic vaccines persist in the blood of vaccine recipients for prolonged periods of time and a variety of adverse events resulting from genetic vaccines are now being reported worldwide.

There is an undeniable risk that patients may experience some problems if they receive blood products derived from blood collected in, at least, a brief deferral period after genetic vaccination.

It should also be stressed that the issues discussed here are matters that pertain to all organ transplants, including bone marrow transplants, and not just blood products. The impact of these genetic vaccines on blood products and the actual damage caused by them are unknown at present. Therefore, in order to avoid these risks and prevent further expansion of blood contamination and complication of the situation, we strongly request that the vaccination campaign using genetic vaccines be suspended and that a harm–benefit assessment be carried out.

With 70% of the population taking the Covid jab, our blood supply has been permantely tainted. We can't trust the Red Cross or medical personnel to tell us the truth as they believe all blood is safe, no matter what. You provide the studies, and they still won't acknowledge it.

A study out of Thailand lays out more risks from receiving Covid jabbed blood-

Now, are you hearing about these dangers and safety protocols being put into place to protect vaccine receipients? No, of course not. All we hear is the blood supply is safe, no ifs, and or buts about it. There are studies that say otherwise.

Another study, Concerns regarding Transfusions of Blood Products Derived from Genetic Vaccine Recipients and Proposals for Specific Measures.

The volume of evidence that has recently come to light, we call the attention of medical professionals to the various risks associated with blood transfusions using blood products derived from people who have suffered from long COVID and from genetic vaccine recipients, including those who have received mRNA vaccines.

It has already been shown that LNPs have a tendency to accumulate in specific organs, such as the liver, spleen, ovaries, testes, and bone marrow

There has been considerable debate about the safety of blood products prepared from donated blood of the vaccine recipients and their use in blood transfusion

The impact of these genetic vaccines on blood products and the actual damage caused by them are unknown at present.

Currently, there are 2 pure blood suppliers.

Safe Blood

Blessed by his Blood

Now, lets look at Turbo Cancer as a result of the Covid 19 jab. Cancers in very advanced stages are being seen in younger and younger people. Stage 4 colon cancer is being seen in teenagers! The media and the medical industry are trying to gas light us into believeing this has always been the case, that this is nothing new. Those of us born in the 60s, 70s, 80s and even 90s, did you know of anyone who diagnosed with stage 4 colon cancer in high school? One of my classmates was diagnosed with leukemia shortly after graduation in 1988, unfortunately, she was gone about a year later.

These cancers are coming out of nowhere. They get a clean bill of health, then months later they are diagnosed with Stage 4 cancer.

Here are the cancers that are being seen in the late stages right now-

1. Turbo cancer – existing tumors grow exponentially quicker (plus multiple tumors in multiple organs)

2. Breast cancer

3. Recurrence (and metastasis) after complete remission prior to Covid jab(s)

4. Lung and bronchus cancer

5. Prostate cancer

6. Colon and rectum cancer

7. Stomach and esophageal cancer

Look at #3, recurrence after remission. People who have gone into remission then get the Covid jab, then get a recurrence and this time it's in the later stages. Or, if they are already fighting cancer, the cancer explodes throughout their body. This can happen with blood transfusions as well. The spike proteins can cause turbo cancer throiughout a persons body. (See my article from Feb. 2025 about what happeneed to my husband)

Over 100 studies have shown 17 ways that can cause the cancer mechanism-

1. Genome Instability-triggering mutations that initiate cancer.

2. Immune Escape-Spike protein binds and inhibits tumor suppressor genes like p53 and BRCA1, shielding cancer cells from immune destruction.

3. Impaired DNA Repair Mechanism-Spike protein interferes with essential DNA repair enzymes, increasing the risk of unchecked mutations.

4. Chronic Inflammation-Lipid nanoparticles and spike protein cause long-lasting inflammation, a well-known driver of cancer.

5. Dysregulation of the Immune System-Suppression of T cells and type I interferon weakens cancer surveillance and promotes immune evasion.

6. RNA DisruptionCodon optimization disrupts microRNA networks, destabilizing cell growth regulation and apoptosis.

7. Activation of Oncogenic Pathway-Spike protein indirectly activates MAPK and PI3K/mTOR signaling, fueling tumor growth and metastasis.

8. Tumor Microenvironment AlterationLipid nanoparticles accumulate in tumors, enhancing permeability and potentially accelerating cancer spread.

9. Awakening Dormant CancersPost-vaccination inflammation and immune disruption may trigger recurrence in patients previously in remission.

10. Alteration of Immune Surveillance-Modified mRNA blocks toll-like receptors, making tumor cells "invisible" to the immune system.

11. Frameshift Errors-Synthetic mRNA sometimes produces unintended, aberrant proteins, contributing to oncogenic risk.

12. Multiple Injections-Repeated doses exhaust the immune system and drive class switching to IgG4, promoting tolerance to tumors.

13. DNA Contamination-Residual plasmid DNA found in vaccine vials is replication-competent and could integrate into host genomes.

14. Oncogenic SV40 DNA Sequences-SV40 promoter sequences in Pfizer vials may facilitate genome insertion—this same element is used to induce tumors in lab animals.

15. Deregulation of the Renin-Angiotensin System (RAS)-Spike-induced AT1R activation fosters oxidative stress and uncontrolled cell proliferation.

16. Destruction of the Microbiota-The injections deplete bifidobacteria, weakening immune balance and impairing anti-cancer responses.

17. Increased Resistance to Treatments-Spike exposure prolongs cancer cell survival during chemotherapy, possibly driving treatment resistance.

Another study shows 300 peer reviews studes that shows Covid 19 cancer studies across 27 countries.

Across all 66 case reports/case series (333 cancer cases), cancers were distributed as follows:

Lymphoma: ~38%

Carcinoma: ~16%

Other tumors: ~16%

Melanoma: ~9%

Sarcoma: ~9%

Glioma/Glioblastoma: ~7%

Leukemia: ~6%

Among COVID-19 vaccination–associated cases, lymphoid malignancies were even more prominent:

Lymphoma: ~43%

Carcinoma: ~16%

Sarcoma: ~11%

Other tumors: ~16%

Melanoma: ~5%

Glioma/Glioblastoma: ~4%

Leukemia: ~5%

SARS-CoV-2 infection–only cases were rare and showed a limited tumor spectrum:

Carcinoma: ~40%

Glioma/Glioblastoma: ~40%

Melanoma: ~20%

Cases involving both SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination showed a broader distribution:

Melanoma: ~29%

Other tumors: ~29%

Lymphoma: ~14%

Leukemia: ~14%

Glioma/Glioblastoma: ~14%

Across the 333 cancer cases:

~50% of cases occurred within 2–4 weeks of vaccination

Some appeared within 7–14 days

Others emerged over 2–6 months or longer

Several underlying studies reported mean onset intervals of ~8–9 weeks

I know what you are thinking, there are just small numbers of people who have gotten cancer after getting the shot. That isn't true. There are MILLIONS of people who have gotten cancer after getting the Covid jab.

South Korea (≈8.4 million individuals):

A nationwide cohort analysis identified statistically significant associations between COVID-19 vaccination and multiple cancer types, including thyroid, colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate cancers. Associations varied by vaccine platform, cumulative dose, age, and sex, indicating heterogeneity rather than a uniform background effect.

Italy (≈300,000 individuals):

A population-based study found higher cancer hospitalization rates among vaccinated individuals, with the strongest signals observed at shorter latency intervals following vaccination.

U.S. military (≈1.3 million service members):

Longitudinal surveillance data documented a post-2021 increase in T/NK-cell lymphomas coinciding with the transition from the pre-pandemic period to near-universal COVID-19 vaccination in this highly structured population.

Here is the link to the full study for the data above- COVID vaccination and post-infection cancer signals: Evaluating patterns and potential biological mechanisms

Another study COVID-19 mRNA-Induced “Turbo Cancers”-

Turbo cancer isn't a formally recognized oncologic classification, but the term has gained traction among clinicians describing a pattern of unusually aggressive, rapidly progressing cancers—particularly among younger individuals and those previously in remission.

Dr William Makis is a Immunologist, Oncologist, Nuclear Medicine Specialist, this is what he says about turbo cancer-

A newly apparent phenomenom where people are presenting suddenly and late with rapid tumours, already often advanced with metastasis (spread to distant sites). The tumours don't respond as normal to treatments, and patients often die in weeks or months from diagnosis. They are generally younger than usual, too. After a hundred years and trillions of dollars on the so-called ‘war on cancer’, still the most important predicitve factor for survival is early diagnosis, so these rapidly developing cancers are disastrous, and their scale is unprecedented.

The Covid jab contains SV40. This was used in the polio vaccine between 1955 and 1963. Many people developed cancer as a result of monkey kidney cells being put into the vaccine. And now it's being used again in the Covid jab.

Dr Peter McCullough talks about turbo cancer in this video.

Not one of us regrets NOT taking the vaccine. I hope the info provided in this article provides the info that proves once and for all the blood transfusions aren't safe and turbo cancer real.

Stay strong.

GLP 1 medications-Miracle weight loss drugs or a killer?

I've heard people say since I was very young, If only there was a pill or shot I could take to lose weight. It would be so easy to lose weight that way. Losing weight takes hard work, when you earn it you really don't want to go back to where you were because you worked so hard.

Currently there are 13 weight loss drugs on the market. Each one has gila monster venom in it. I know what you are asking....What is a gila monster? Here is a pic of one-

The first thing you are thinking......gross, eww, why?

When a gila monster bites it's prey, it paralyzes it's victims. It paralyzes the vagus nerve which reaches out to all parts of the body. The body starts to shut down and eventually dies.

The gila monster venom in the GLP meds shuts down various parts of the body, mainly the digestive system. But, there are other side affects that are becoming apparent. It affects your vision and oral health. America is about to see a lot of vagus nerve damage among the people who are taking these GLP 1 meds.

This is a video with Dr. Bryan Ardis talking about GLP medications and the gila monster venom in it. He not only discovered the venom in the GLP 1 meds but also venom from creatures all over the world in the Covid jab.

Dr. Bryan Ardis reveals BOMBSHELL findings about reptilian VENOM PEPTIDES in popular weight loss drugs, and role of NICOTINE in healing “long COVID”

Side affects of Ozempic & Wegovy

Nausea and vomiting

Diarrhea

Abdominal pain

Headache

Dizziness and vertigo

Fainting or loss of consciousness

Rapid heartbeat (tachycardia)

Cold, clammy skin

Muscle weakness or paralysis

Numbness or tingling in the face, arms, or legs

Difficulty speaking or swallowing

Blurred vision or double vision

Low blood pressure

Rapid heart rate

Cardiac arrest

Difficulty breathing

Shortness of breath

Respiratory failure

But what if you are trying to lose the weight and it simply won't come off. These GLP 1 meds may seem like the way to go. No, there is another way to lose weight. Dr. Mindy Pelz taks about intermitten fasting. You have a smaller window of time to eat. You make better choices, you eat food that is going to fill you up longer, so you aren't hungry in a few hours or wake up in the middle of the night with your stomach grumbling.

Check her out at her youtube channel-

Dr Mindy Pelz

So, are you ready for that appointment to ask your doctor if Gila monster venom is right for you?

Run for your lives, the sky is falling!

Just kidding......it's just measles.

In 2011, Patricia Quinlisk, former head of the Iowa Department of Health declared a public health emergency over a single case of measles.

In case you haven't heard, there is a case of measles in Iowa in a VACCINATED adult that has returned from traveling internationally. And of course, the Iowa deparmtnent of Health is yelling for everyone to get vaccinated.

Of course what you aren't being told is that if you get vaccinated, you can spread the virus for up to 4 weeks as the MMR is LIVE virus vaccine. So, what this means, if you get a MMR vaccine, go home, stay there for about 4 weeks so you don't endanger those around you.

Shedding of measles vaccine RNA in children after receiving measles, mumps and rubella vaccination

As more people run and get vaccinated or get their boosters or do the same for their kids, measles will continue to run rampant. Here are some other things you aren't told about the MMR vaccine.

It hasn't been tested as to whether or not it will affect fertility.

Or whether it will cause fetal harm.

If you are breast feeding and you get the MMR vaccine, you can excrete in your milk and affect your baby.

Cases of aseptic meningitis have occurred after received the MMR vaccine.

Atypical measles.

And there have been deaths associated with the MMR vaccine.

You can read the insert at this link.

According to an article by Physicians for Informed Consent, the risk for the MMR vaccine is greater than the risk for the measles virus.

And, despite what the CDC, FDA and your child's pediatrician says. It has NOT been proben that getting the MMR vaccine is safer than getting measles.

Read what the doctors for Physicians for Informed Consent say.

Now, you can make an informed choice or at least be armed with questions for the doctor when it comes to the MMR vaccine.