Show me the money

Greetings,

No, I'm not asking for donations.  The money that big pharma is using to push their vaccine agenda is becoming very apparent & a few articles came to light this week that shows this.

So, lets take a look at Dr. Paul Offit to start.  Whenever you see a story on vaccines on TV, this is the first person that you see.  Rarely do you get the other side of the argument but if you do hear the other side, if you do they don't get nearly the same amount of air time as Dr. Offit does. 

So, how much money does Dr. Offit get paid to promote vaccines?  2 words - too much.  He holds a $1.5 million dollar research chair at Children's Hospital in Philly which is funded by Merck.  He holds a patent on an anti-diarrhea vaccine, developed by Merck for which the future royalties were sold for over $180 million.  Dr. Offit's share - unknown.  Dr. Offit is also a consultant for Merck.

Merck pays webmd.com $3.5 million per year to have a Lifetime of Vaccines web page on their website.   

Merck also used their influence to make sure a bill was passed in the State of California that a child could get vaccines without the consent of their parents.  A student could even get the Gardisil shot.  Merck paid 25 different lawmakers varying amounts of money.  (again, Merck comes into play)

Just this week, the Institute of Medicine came out & said that the current vaccination schedule is safe for our children that are receiving them.  Most would read thru this article & not give it a second thought.  But a more careful read will show "the bottom line."

"In this most comprehensive examination of the immunization schedule to date, the IOM committee uncovered no evidence of major safety concerns associated with adherence to the childhood immunization schedule, which should help to reassure a diverse group of stakeholders," according to the report.

Let take a look at how the immunization schedule is set up.  There is an advisory committee to the CDC that sets up the schedule, as to how many vaccines & when.  Most of the people on this advisory committee are shareholders in pharmaceutical companies.  So the more money that the pharmaceuticals companies make, the more money they make.  The members of this committee are supposed to fill out forms that shows their vested interests but most of the time this section isn't filled out & no questions are asked.

So, big pharma wants to start "vaccinations" on infants as soon as they are born & have us continue throughout our lifetime.  Lifelong customers is what you'll hear from a lot of retail stores, I don't think big pharma is any different.

Like I've said before, there is time & place for doctors & medicine.  How many of you growing up were taken to the clinic every 2 months?  Ask your parents, I'm going to guess you weren't.  I remember going every year thru age 10 & then I only went as needed.  I mainly visited specialists for a few years because of severe allergies & migraines.  A chiropracter that I talked to once said that the stress of losing my dad when I was 7 made my immune system go "tilt" & go bonkers for awhile which may have caused a lot of my health issues when I was younger.  I still have some issues but have managed to overcome a great deal of them thru natural healing.

You have the power to heal yourself, don't ask permission when none is required. 

Until next time,

Lori

Reference pages -

http://www.medpagetoday.com/Pediatrics/Vaccines/36866

http://vactruth.com/2013/01/04/merck-paid-webmd-millions/?utm_source=The+Vaccine+Truth+Newsletter&utm_campaign=081d7be8e1-01_03_2013_webmd&utm_medium=email

http://www.drpauloffit.org/

http://www.phillymag.com/articles/will-this-doctor-hurt-your-baby/2/

http://www.whale.to/v/offit1.html

http://www.whale.to/vaccine/september_15.html

http://www.webmd.com/lifetime-of-vaccines/history

http://www.calwatchdog.com/2011/09/06/merck-funded-anti-parent-bill/

A Super Close Look at the Flu Shot

Greetings,

As I was researching for the last article, I came across this info.  It's very damming & very informational.

The informational material I found was the MSDS sheets on vaccines, Thimerosal & Mercury.  I hope you are sitting down when you read this & please pass it on to every parent, pregnant mom & anybody else that might be interested in this. 

First, lets take a look at the MSDS sheet for mercury.  Remember, there is 25 mcg of mercury in this years flu shot. 

Section 3 - Hazards Identification -

The substance may be toxic to blood, kidneys, liver, brain, peripheral nervous system, central nervous system (CNS). Repeated or prolonged exposure to the substance can produce target organs damage.  Repeated exposure to a highly toxic material may produce general deterioration of health by an accumulation in one or many human organs.  (think about annual flu shots here)

 

Section 7 -  Handling & Storage -

 

Do not ingest.  (but its ok to inject?)

 

Section 11 - Toxicological Information

 

May affect genetic material. May cause cancer based on animal data. Passes through the placental barrier in animal. May cause adverse reproductive effects(paternal effects- spermatogenesis; effects on fertility - fetotoxicity, post-implantation mortality), and birth defects.  (remember, they suggest pregnant moms get the flu shot)

 

Section 13 - Disposal Info -

 

Waste must be disposed of in accordance with federal, state and local environmental control regulations.

Section 15 - Regulatory Information -

California prop. 65: This product contains the following ingredients for which the State of California has found to cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm, which would require a warning under the statute: Mercury California prop. 65: This product contains the following ingredients for which the State of California has found to cause birth defects which would require a warning under the statute:

 

DSCL (EEC):
R33- Danger of cumulative effects.  S2- Keep out of the reach of children. 

Now looking back over this info that I pulled from the MSDS sheet & thinking about the Flu shot that has 25 mcg of mercury in it.  Do you REALLY want that stuff in injected into you?

Now, lets take a look at Thimerosal.  This is still in some vaccines, mostly in trace amounts BUT its still there.

Section 3 - Hazards Identification

The substance may be toxic to kidneys, liver, spleen, bone marrow, central nervous system (CNS). Repeated or prolonged exposure to the substance can produce target organs damage. Repeated exposure to a highly toxic material may produce general deterioration of health by an accumulation in one or many human organs.

 

Section 11 - Toxological Information

May cause cancer based on animal data. No human data found. May cause adverse reproductive effects(female fertility - post implanation mortality, fetotoxicity)and birth defects. May affect genetic material

Special Remarks on other Toxic Effects on Humans:

Acute exposure to high concentrations of mercury vapors may also cause kidney damage and affect behavior/central nervous system, peripheral nervous system and autonomic nervous system

Chronic exposure to mercury vapors behavior/central nervous system and peripheral nervous system (depression, irritability, nervousness, weakness, ataxia, fatigue, tremor, jerky gait, limb spasms, personality changes)

Section 13 - Disposal Considerations

Waste must be disposed of in accordance with federal, state and local environmental control regulations.
Section 15 - Other Regulatory Information

California prop. 65: This product contains the following ingredients for which the State of California has found to cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm, which would require a warning under the statute: Thimerosal California prop. 65: This product contains the following ingredients for which the State of California has found to cause birth defects which would require a warning under the statute:

Now, lets take a look at the Novartis FluVirin MSDS sheet.  This is shocking if I haven't shocked you enough as it is.

Section 3 - Hazard Information

3.3. Avoid contact with the material if you are pregnant or breast-feeding.

(Read that again, they are telling pregnant women to get this shot)

Section 4 - First Aid Info

Seek medical attention if unusual symptoms occur e.g. high temperature, shivering, tiredness, headache, sweating, muscle pain, joint pain and generally feeling unwell. Following vaccination (i.e. deliberate subcutaneous inoculation), fever, malaise, myalgia, headache and other systemic symptoms can occur, especially in young children who have had no previous exposure to influenza antigens. These reactions begin 6-12 hours after vaccination and persist for 1 to 2 days. In older persons, vaccination is not associated with higher rates of systemic symptoms.

Section 11 - Toxological Information

The vaccine contains mercury at approximately 2.48μg per 0.5 mL dose (pre-filled syringe) and 24.8μg of mercury per 0.5 mL dose (multi dose vials).

Section 12 - Ecological Information

The vaccine contains mercury and therefore should be prevented from entering watercourses or the atmosphere (by aerosol).
Section 13 - Disposal Considerations

Residues of mercury containing compounds are generally classified as special waste. Contact your local waste disposal authority for advice, or pass to a chemical disposal company.

Mercury has been classified for special waste BUT yet its ok to inject into people.  What is wrong with this picture??!!??

There are many more MSDS sheets listed for vaccines at this website -

http://www.bdipharma.com/clinical-pi-msds-vaccines.aspx

Are you disgusted as I am after reading this info & thinking about all the lies we are told via the TV news, news papers, our local officials & our doctors who are supposed to have our health in our best interest?  Remember part of the oath that doctors take - Do no harm. 

If you local TV stations talk about how "There is still time to get your flu shot," please pass on this info.  I'm doing my best to get the info out there but I can only cover so much. 

Thank you for your ongoing support.  You don't know how your readership has helped me the last 18 months when I was so low & feeling defeated.

Until next time,

Lori

Works cited -


http://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9927224

http://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9925236

http://www.bdipharma.com/MSDS/Novartis/Fluvirin%203-09.pdf

Another Look at the Flu Shot

Greetings,

As I look at articles posted on the net, I see more & more nurses are being fired for not getting the flu shot as mandated by their employer.  The employers are saying that getting the flu shot will reduce the risk of transmission to their patients.  Is this really the fact?  What does research actually say?

The Cochrane Institute did 25 studies that involved over 59,000 participants & found that

“There is no reliable evidence that inactivated influenza vaccines [the standard types of vaccines of today] affect either person-to-person spread of influenza or complications such as death or pneumonia…and [this] relates both to healthcare workers, community-dwellers and people in institutions.”

Another interesting point of this study was -

Vaccine use did not affect the number of people hospitalised or working days lost.

Another interesting point of these studies is -

The review showed that reliable evidence on the flu vaccine is thin but there is wide spread evidence of wide spread manipulation of concluions and spurious notoriety of the studies.

Widespread manipulation?  Considering that the vaccine industry helped fund 15 of the studies, this is no surprise to me.

So, why is there the push to vaccinate health care workers?  Why are employers telling their nurses, even ones that have been there for over 20 years, get your flu shot or else.  The Department of Health & Human Services want employers to have a 90% flu shot rate.  Starting this year, health care providers could see a cut in their Medicare funding if they don't report vaccination rates.  Once again it all boils down to  one word - money.  Money for health care providers & money for big pharma.

Does OSHA support the mandation of the flu shot?  Here is what OSHA says about the flu shot.

"Although OSHA does not specifically require employees to take the vaccines, an employer may do so. In that case, an employee who refuses vaccination because of a reasonable belief that he or she has a medical condition that creates a real danger of serious illness or death (such as serious reaction to the vaccine) may be protected under Section 11(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 pertaining to whistle blower rights. "

This section basically states that an employee can't be discriminated against as filed a complaint under this act. 

So why do hospitals continue to mandate the flu shot for their employees & threaten termination if they don't get it or at least mandate them to wear a mask if they don't?  This is a good question.  The requirement of an employee having to wear a mask is identifying them as a person that refuses to comply with the flu shot mandation. 

This is a topic that needs to be addressed by nurses, CNAs & other health care providers.

Until next time,
Lori


Works Cited -

http://gaia-health.com/gaia-blog/2012-10-05/no-value-in-any-influenza-vaccine-cochrane-collaboration-study/

http://focusonline.ca/?q=node/447

http://www.truthistreason.net/%E2%80%98influenza-vaccine-has-no-effect%E2%80%99-cochrane-collaboration-study-says

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD001269.pub4/pdf/abstract

http://vactruth.com/2012/09/22/no-flu-shot-no-job/

http://www.usnews.com/science/articles/2010/10/26/should-health-care-workers-be-required-to-get-flu-vaccinations

http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2012/02/13/prsc0214.htm

http://www.naturalnews.com/037620_flu_vaccines_effectiveness_exaggerations.html